• This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn more.
  • To post you need to register an account and await approval. Click Here to sign up!

Mark Humphrys is a Snowflake and a Fawning Zionist

Joined
Oct 30, 2015
Messages
6,054
Likes
7,156
Points
313
#42
I'd say he did support the Axis. Especially as a counter to British domination, enemy of my enemy is my friend logic. But also because he had actual support in his heart for the National Socialist regime in Germany. He kept a portrait of Hitler in his home even after the war, he called him the "greatest European" and telgrammed the Germans expressing his sympathies on Dáil headed paper. He wept when he heard of the death of Hitler. A good Irish leader who fought for freedom, not democracy.
I will look into this, but where did you read this or hear it from? I read a book on him that debunked the claim that he was an avid admirer of Hitler, saying it was all West Brit propaganda and I'm inclined to believe that.
 

El Chaval.

Respected Member
Joined
Oct 31, 2015
Messages
1,561
Likes
2,697
Points
163
#43
I will look into this, but where did you read this or hear it from? I read a book on him that debunked the claim that he was an avid admirer of Hitler, saying it was all West Brit propaganda and I'm inclined to believe that.

I'd say it was possible he admired the German side and Hitler.
IRA propaganda at the time was definately on the side of the German forces.
 
Joined
Oct 30, 2015
Messages
6,054
Likes
7,156
Points
313
#45
I'd say it was possible he admired the German side and Hitler.
IRA propaganda at the time was definately on the side of the German forces.
Part of the Republican movement was- remember a lot of people were interned. The full on Pro-Axis stuff from the Republican movement came from this character called John J O'Kelly who also did this magazine called the Catholic Bulletin which is an treasure trove of information when it comes to Irish Jacobite history and the Pre-Norman Church but also advocated full on actual Catholic Nationalism (that term is thrown around a lot but this lad was very much that). He was elected for Sinn Fein during the 1918 in Louth and was though very anti-Treaty.

John J. O'Kelly - Wikipedia
 
Joined
Mar 31, 2017
Messages
964
Likes
333
Points
63
Location
Dublin
#46
They were great folks. They lathered Dublin in posters saying: SIX DIVISIONS, SIX COUNTIES, SIX MINUTES. One of the best nationalist movements for the sake of them being so strongly republican. Unlike blueshirts who were too close to the pro treaty side.
A bunch of screwy fantasists.

The party wished to create a fascist one-party state ruled by a leader known as a 'Ceannaire'. Aiséirghe promised full employment, an end to emigration (by making it a criminal offence to leave the country), discrimination against Jews and freemasons and the reconquest of Northern Ireland by the massive conscript army. They also promised to make the use of the English language in public illegal after five years in power[8]
The party intended for the state to stay out of World War II until the participants were worn out and then emerge as a world leader.[9]
It could almost be parody.

But on a serious note, if in some alternate reality such an organisation somehow managed to gain traction, concerned citizens would be justified, IMO, in machine gunning down its leadership as an exercise in pre-emptive self defense.

Their policies were little more than the advocacy of extreme coercion against the individual.
Threats of violence and coercion -- whether instigated directly or through co-opting the machinery of the state -- shouldn't be covered by free speech laws; they're acts of aggression.
 
Joined
Oct 8, 2016
Messages
6,355
Likes
9,895
Points
313
#47

I joined Twitter a week ago to take on the Abortionist freaks. I must have been doing it well, as Twitter has already shadow banned me. This means they are blocking my messages without letting me know they're blocked. Anyway, before that I noticed that Mark Humphries was complaining that two fellows were picking on him. I even went over to his page to give him a bit of backup - only to see that his page is littered with fawning tributes to ZioNazism. I got into a discussion with him telling him I agreed fully about what he has to say about Clonskeagh Mosque, but not to make the mistake of backing anyone that seems to be against Islam. He told me that he supports Israel because he supports Liberal democracy, and that it is Liberal democracy that has made Europe Great. I said - Are you joking? Europe is in demographic and cultural collapse because of Liberal democracy. He seemed to have no answer to that and took the huff saying he wouldn't talk to a supporter of dictatorships like me. What a Snowflake.
He supports Israel because it is a strong nation-state with strict immigration policies to favour and preserve the ethnic character and culture of the Israeli nation. They give unwanted migrants two choices: Be impounded in a desert compound or take $3,500 and be deported. If he wants to define that as liberal democracy, that's fine. We should all work to have his vision of a liberal democracy implemented in Ireland.
 
Joined
Oct 30, 2015
Messages
6,054
Likes
7,156
Points
313
#48
He supports Israel because it is a strong nation-state with strict immigration policies to favour and preserve the ethnic character and culture of the Israeli nation. They give unwanted migrants two choices: Be impounded in a desert compound or take $3,500 and be deported. If he wants to define that as liberal democracy, that's fine. We should all work to have his vision of a liberal democracy implemented in Ireland.
Has he come out and said that is his reason?
 
Joined
Mar 17, 2016
Messages
4,296
Likes
6,428
Points
263
Location
The land of the golden potato
#50
Dan Breen enjoyed trolling the humourless neo-Redmondite FG cucks of his day and no better way to Alpha Troll them than bolting on a pic Hitler onto the wall; the ultimate enemy of the Englishman. It's only in the late sixties onward that Hitler went from super villain to getting his hoves, tail and horns fitted.

Fundamentally, Breen was a man with a fine heart and a robust constitution. More like George S Patton than anyone else.
 

El Chaval.

Respected Member
Joined
Oct 31, 2015
Messages
1,561
Likes
2,697
Points
163
#51
Part of the Republican movement was- remember a lot of people were interned. The full on Pro-Axis stuff from the Republican movement came from this character called John J O'Kelly who also did this magazine called the Catholic Bulletin which is an treasure trove of information when it comes to Irish Jacobite history and the Pre-Norman Church but also advocated full on actual Catholic Nationalism (that term is thrown around a lot but this lad was very much that). He was elected for Sinn Fein during the 1918 in Louth and was though very anti-Treaty.

John J. O'Kelly - Wikipedia
Well, you had the CoS of the IRA in German submarines, and high rankers like Frank Ryan mooching round Berlin.
Plus the S plan in England which began in 1939.
And the meetings in Dublin with IRA leadership and a Nazi "diplomat".
Leading Republican propagandists like Francis Stewart even moved to Germany during the war in order to broadcast pro-German news to Ireland.
It was more than a few rogues.
 
Joined
Oct 30, 2015
Messages
6,054
Likes
7,156
Points
313
#52
I'm guessing that has to be the reason.
Why would someone support an ethno-state for one nation but not support it for your own.
It wouldn't make any sense.

:confused:
Because the Zionist "Colonial Project" is an outpost of "Liberal Democracy" and that at the end of the day Beyoncé is going to convince everyone including the Muslims of the good of that eventually. A lot of the time people aren't rational- I make an effort to be but frequently fail- and he sees being pro-Zionism as Pro-West with the West being about certain values as opposed to anything ethnic. He would consider the Hard Right Bishop Richard Williamson to be anti-West for instance where as others could make arguments that he was a Western Chauvinist.
 
Joined
Mar 17, 2016
Messages
4,296
Likes
6,428
Points
263
Location
The land of the golden potato
#53
I'm guessing that has to be the reason.
Why would someone support an ethno-state for one nation but not support it for your own.
It wouldn't make any sense.

:confused:
Because neocons want to spread free-market liberalism across the world. They think it's a stabilising factor and a prime moral good. Whereas Saddam is Hitler who must be defeated as a moral imperative. Humphrey is a clown who thinks George Bush is John Wayne essentially.

The totality of Humphreys views would see several chaos vectors emerge and would pour petrol on the migration mushroom cloud. He's a pompous fool who gets his kicks living in a "Greatest Generation" replay. He's not some Kissingerite pragmatist you think he is.
 
Joined
Oct 30, 2015
Messages
6,054
Likes
7,156
Points
313
#54
Well, you had the CoS of the IRA in German submarines, and high rankers like Frank Ryan mooching round Berlin.
Plus the S plan in England which began in 1939.
And the meetings in Dublin with IRA leadership and a Nazi "diplomat".
Leading Republican propagandists like Francis Stewart even moved to Germany during the war in order to broadcast pro-German news to Ireland.
It was more than a few rogues.
Francis Stuart's broadcasts if you read aren't hysterically Pro-Hitler at all, I have read them (they were published by his enemies in the Lillput Press as supposedly damning but given the historical circumstances no one sane would have a problem with them) and while there are moving bits in them, there is nothing psycho unlike William Joyce's broadcasts. The IRA said clearly that they would accept German help but if Germany invaded Ireland they would find an enemy in them. By the way I consider Francis Stuart one of the greatest Irish people of the 20 th century.
 

El Chaval.

Respected Member
Joined
Oct 31, 2015
Messages
1,561
Likes
2,697
Points
163
#55
Francis Stuart's broadcasts if you read aren't hysterically Pro-Hitler at all, I have read them (they were published by his enemies in the Lillput Press as supposedly damning but given the historical circumstances no one sane would have a problem with them) and while there are moving bits in them, there is nothing psycho unlike William Joyce's broadcasts. The IRA said clearly that they would accept German help but if Germany invaded Ireland they would find an enemy in them. By the way I consider Francis Stuart one of the greatest Irish people of the 20 th century.
Did you ever read the IRA pamphlet he wrote describing Austria in the pre-War years?
 
Joined
Oct 30, 2015
Messages
6,054
Likes
7,156
Points
313
#57
Did you ever read the IRA pamphlet he wrote describing Austria in the pre-War years?
Uh Austria had had a coup to prevent a Socialist Government, and the government that came to power through it was besotted with the Jewish economist Ludwig Von Mises who created a total nightmare for working and small farming people. That is why the Austrians by and large welcomed the Hitlerite invasion and it was pretty understandable. No I haven't read that pamphlet.
 
Joined
Oct 8, 2016
Messages
6,355
Likes
9,895
Points
313
#59
Because neocons want to spread free-market liberalism across the world. They think it's a stabilising factor and a prime moral good. Whereas Saddam is Hitler who must be defeated as a moral imperative. Humphrey is a clown who thinks George Bush is John Wayne essentially.

The totality of Humphreys views would see several chaos vectors emerge and would pour petrol on the migration mushroom cloud. He's a pompous fool who gets his kicks living in a "Greatest Generation" replay. He's not some Kissingerite pragmatist you think he is.
Well I was only being facetious and trying to needle him.
His bible is the National Review and I understand he just parrots whatever the neocons say.
He became unhinged over Trump's election, called him names that would make Kim Jong-un blush.
Massive critic of Islam but doesn't actually want to do anything that would stop their continued mass immigration to the west.
That wouldn't be "liberal", you see. Gosh, he might lose his column in the Sunday Times.
No, he'd rather elect Hillary like the rest of the necons.
 
Joined
Mar 31, 2017
Messages
964
Likes
333
Points
63
Location
Dublin
#60
Uh Austria had had a coup to prevent a Socialist Government, and the government that came to power through it was besotted with the Jewish economist Ludwig Von Mises who created a total nightmare for working and small farming people. That is why the Austrians by and large welcomed the Hitlerite invasion and it was pretty understandable. No I haven't read that pamphlet.
Imagine the nightmare they would've had under socialism.