• This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn more.
  • To post you need to register an account and await approval. Click Here to sign up!

National Planning Framework — Ireland 2040 — The plan to increase Ireland's population by 1 million

Joined
Oct 8, 2016
Messages
6,355
Likes
9,893
Points
313
#1
National Planning Framework — Ireland 2040 — The plan to increase Ireland's population by 1 million by 2040

The Irish Taoiseach Leo Varadkar says he plans to increase Ireland's population by one million people by 2040 as the National Planning Framework — Ireland 2040 — is due to be finalised next week.


The Minister For Health Simon Harris says It's a major plan which is going to shape the development of Ireland for the next number of years backed up by billions of euro in capital investment.


Tánaiste Simon Coveney says he wants to double the population of every city outside Dublin.


Brian Hayes MEP says that by 2050 the population of Nigeria could be over 400 million people and Europe needs to turn that to our advantage:
http://archive.is/6OhVd

60% of Africans are unemployed in Ireland:
Monitoring report on integration 2016 | ESRI - The Economic and Social Research Institute

National Planning Framework:
http://npf.ie/

Meanwhile, the new Chancellor of Austria, Sebastian Kurz which Leo just met:


 
Last edited:

maxflinn

Legend
Donator
Joined
Oct 31, 2015
Messages
3,896
Likes
4,674
Points
263
#4
I was speaking to my parents who are not at all politically-minded recently about all this immigration and was happy to hear that they think it's crazy. They never seemed to mind it before, but now even they're wondering what the fu** the government is doing as they put it: 'to our little country'.

A little anecdote, but I've a feeling more people than not are thinking the same way...
 

Tadhg Gaelach

Legend
Donator
Joined
Jan 14, 2016
Messages
23,586
Likes
19,129
Points
313
#5
I was speaking to my parents who are not at all politically-minded recently about all this immigration and was happy to hear that they think it's crazy. They never seemed to mind it before, but now even they're wondering what the fu** the government is doing as they put it: 'to our little country'.

A little anecdote, but I've a feeling more people than not are thinking the same way...

Yes, I agree. But, sadly, there is no political party for them to support. Until we have that, I'm afraid the Invasion and Plantation will proceed at ever increasing velocity. Trying to stand between the Gombeen elite and their cheap migrant labour and rents is not something that individuals can do. We need a powerful political organisation. Of course the National Party is doing its best, but it won't be able to gain the confidence of the middle of the road people.
 

maxflinn

Legend
Donator
Joined
Oct 31, 2015
Messages
3,896
Likes
4,674
Points
263
#6
Yes, I agree. But, sadly, there is no political party for them to support. Until we have that, I'm afraid the Invasion and Plantation will proceed at ever increasing velocity. Trying to stand between the Gombeen elite and their cheap migrant labour and rents is not something that individuals can do. We need a powerful political organisation. Of course the National Party is doing its best, but it won't be able to gain the confidence of the middle of the road people.
As I've said before it's my view that any such party will inevitably gain the support of people who are openly racist and the media will then label the whole thing as racist. This will put a lot of people off associating with it.

Any such party needs to be very clear about what it stands for, i.e. preserving our cultural identity, our Christian values, our heritage, our way of life basically. I think it ought to be asking how we will cope during recessions when there'll be so many more people to support, to house, to feed, to provide public services for etc when we can't even manage now, and with automation meaning fewer people being needed in factories going forward etc.

I think any such party needs to be calling not for a halt to immigration but for a big reduction in it, for a time at least until we steady ourselves and see what's what for a few years.

If it's full of dummies like Tommy Robinson shouting about Muslims wanting to take over the world it will fail to gain the support required, IMO.
 

Tadhg Gaelach

Legend
Donator
Joined
Jan 14, 2016
Messages
23,586
Likes
19,129
Points
313
#9
As I've said before it's my view that any such party will inevitably gain the support of people who are openly racist and the media will then label the whole thing as racist. This will put a lot of people off associating with it.

Any such party needs to be very clear about what it stands for, i.e. preserving our cultural identity, our Christian values, our heritage, our way of life basically. I think it ought to be asking how we will cope during recessions when there'll be so many more people to support, to house, to feed, to provide public services for etc when we can't even manage now, and with automation meaning fewer people being needed in factories going forward etc.

I think any such party needs to be calling not for a halt to immigration but for a big reduction in it, for a time at least until we steady ourselves and see what's what for a few years.

If it's full of dummies like Tommy Robinson shouting about Muslims wanting to take over the world it will fail to gain the support required, IMO.

But the minute you even mention preserving cultural identity - they media will brand you a wacist or even worst - a Nationalist. But I fully agree that the message has to be "managing migration" rather than stopping it. Any targeting of specific religions or minorities will be impossible for a mass party. Of course, once power is gain, the squeeze can really be put on.
 

maxflinn

Legend
Donator
Joined
Oct 31, 2015
Messages
3,896
Likes
4,674
Points
263
#11
But the minute you even mention preserving cultural identity - they media will brand you a wacist or even worst - a Nationalist. But I fully agree that the message has to be "managing migration" rather than stopping it. Any targeting of specific religions or minorities will be impossible for a mass party. Of course, once power is gain, the squeeze can really be put on.
Yes, managing migration. I think we ought to be constantly reviewing its impact positive and negative, and adopting in a manner that best safeguards our societal wellbeing.

Not just planning to bring millions for purely economic reasons enforced by globalist Oligarchs without a major analysis of all the repercussions in an ever-changing, economically fragile world.
 

El Chaval.

Respected Member
Joined
Oct 31, 2015
Messages
1,561
Likes
2,694
Points
163
#12
As I've said before it's my view that any such party will inevitably gain the support of people who are openly racist and the media will then label the whole thing as racist. This will put a lot of people off associating with it.

Any such party needs to be very clear about what it stands for, i.e. preserving our cultural identity, our Christian values, our heritage, our way of life basically. I think it ought to be asking how we will cope during recessions when there'll be so many more people to support, to house, to feed, to provide public services for etc when we can't even manage now, and with automation meaning fewer people being needed in factories going forward etc.

I think any such party needs to be calling not for a halt to immigration but for a big reduction in it, for a time at least until we steady ourselves and see what's what for a few years.

If it's full of dummies like Tommy Robinson shouting about Muslims wanting to take over the world it will fail to gain the support required, IMO.
The problem is even if you went in front of the media and said you only wanted to preserve your identity and Christian values, you will still be labelled "Racist".
Christ, people were beat up in O Connell Street for opposing ISIS!!!
 
Joined
Nov 2, 2017
Messages
86
Likes
155
Points
33
Location
Kerry
#14
I was speaking to my parents who are not at all politically-minded recently about all this immigration and was happy to hear that they think it's crazy. They never seemed to mind it before, but now even they're wondering what the fu** the government is doing as they put it: 'to our little country'.

A little anecdote, but I've a feeling more people than not are thinking the same way...
The immigration is possibly the biggest worry for the majority of the country but no Dail time has been given to it.

The immigration problem is not killed people coming here to work it is the uneducated, unskilled, freeloading types that don't want to integrate that is the problem.

It is the reason that Brexit was voted for.
 
Joined
Nov 2, 2017
Messages
86
Likes
155
Points
33
Location
Kerry
#15
IBEC has produced a paper calling for increasing the population of the 26 to 10 million. That means a de facto migrant majority.
You have the greens being bothered about the number of cattle in the country damaging the environment. What the fuck would an extra million people do to it?
 

Tadhg Gaelach

Legend
Donator
Joined
Jan 14, 2016
Messages
23,586
Likes
19,129
Points
313
#16
Not a dickie bird about enticing our young Irish to come home.
The emphasis is on bring in Nigerians and letting irish ex-Pats rot abroad.

I see that funding for air fares is being offered to Irish people who "come home" to vote for abortion, i.e. to speed up the Holocaust of the Native Irish.
 
Joined
Jul 31, 2017
Messages
583
Likes
968
Points
93
Location
ireland
#19
I was amazed that the John Waters video pointed to the problem that the people leading us are themselves the lowest common denominator garbage, Nigel Farage in the Dublin 3/2/18, and why would anyone decent want to be a part of the shitshow.

As Waters hinted at, the primary EU countries, just like this country now, are run by childless people, which tends to be default for queers, pedo's, which is why they are useful and easily manipulated. They tend to not have long term thinking in their thought processes, its now now now, whereas if you have children, you think about the future more, eg. what kind of country would i like my children to grow up in vs i dont care when im dead, so fuck you, im getting everything i can out of the now.

And so they make great tools for the elites looking to squeeze as much out of you as possible.
An older example of that is Ted Heath in UK,
Edward Heath - Wikipedia
He was appointed as an Opposition Whip by Winston Churchill in February 1951.
He is famous for bloody sunday and the question around how young the boys he buggered were.
Claims that Sir Edward Heath was a paedophile are '120 per cent genuine', police chief claims Claims that Sir Edward Heath was a paedophile are '120 per cent genuine', police chief claims

When Enoch Powell started calling out the obvious problems and Heath got rid of him. Powell got crucified because the words he used were easy to manipulate as being wacist.
Enoch was paddling in sewage, and he knew it | Daily Mail Online
By doing so, he handed a gift to the anti-British, multi-culti, pro-immigration liberals which they have treasured ever since.
Heath was also constant in trying to get the UK into what was then called the EEC, there's a lot of other stuff on this creep, but its for a different time if ever.
Edward Heath - Wikipedia
In 1960 Macmillan appointed Heath Lord Privy Seal with responsibility for the negotiations to secure the UK's first attempt to join the European Economic Community (as the European Community was then called). After extensive negotiations, involving detailed agreements about the UK's agricultural trade with Commonwealth countries such as New Zealand, British entry was vetoed by the French President, Charles de Gaulle, at a press conference in January 1963 – much to the disappointment of Heath, who was a firm supporter of European common market membership for the United Kingdom. He oversaw a successful application when serving in a higher position a decade later.[26][27]
This is why Brexit and Farage(who has shouldered what was left of Powells legacy) is so important.
If England takes control of their borders again and stops the reinforcing stream of invaders, the birth rate for these immigrants should fall off sharply after a number of generations as the good life and the call of a second car and more handbags starts to beckon. But they need to clear that place out at the top, if they succeed in getting out of europe, of all these Heath types.

As was pointed out above, more consumption, is the goal. Women through emancipation were the biggest drivers of consumption, but this is maxing out already, so the response is more people in general. And as sex doesnt matter now, we are all just plebs who just consume. No different to them pushing that diesel cars are bad again, now that 70% of us have bought them, instead we need to buy electric or at the very least a petrol car instead. At the same time they are telling us that polar bears are dieing again, so buy an electric car or the polar bear dies. But the fake news is starting to get thin.

So its much easier to sell shit you dont need to a 85/90 IQ mutt, or control an overweight stuffed pleb, high on sugar, especially when they become dependent on the insulin and the medical industry. All the systems will be able to make their fortunes off them, and theyll be glad to hand over whatever they produce to get whatever it is they are now addicted/dependent to/on.
Smart enough to know how to sign up to getting a credit card, but not enough to question what the fuck is going on or why i am a debt slave now.
They want you to keep the consumption/debt cycle going or they will replace you with someone who will buy everything they are told to buy, and live how they are told to live.

They are already building more prisons in England to put all the mutts and malcontents.
And ramping up the war rhetoric, to get more military spending, need to find someplace for all these future mutts to send out someplace to bomb the shit out of.
As long as all the semi state institutions get a piece of the pie, everyone will be locked in enough that the status quo will continue. They want Europe to be an Amerimutt clone, where income inequality continues to rise and the class divides are reinforced.

As an aside, funny how both this country and the uk has a massive labour shortage in building these prisons and houeses (future ethnic enclaves !!), with all these workers coming to our shores , makes you wonder what/why we are importing.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Jul 31, 2017
Messages
583
Likes
968
Points
93
Location
ireland
#20
Sorry for the wall of text, but someone might get use from it.
Democracy is just one person one vote, the question is what kind of society do you want to live in.

If the people lived in a socially cohesive positive country, and there was an issue with the political elite, all we would need to do is not vote, and it would deligitimise and clear the whole lot of them out, along with any allegiances to outside parties with globalist/banker/corporate masters they might have.
But if you have multiple class/generational/ethnic divisions, then this no longer works, as people will vote if it means getting more out of the pot for them over you. The melting pot is like rats in a cage, the strong/clever/immoral/cohesive are more likely to thrive.

This is why you might want an extra million foreigners to stop any national leaning party from messing up the party for the political parties that exist today and the media behind them.
Look at who you have, fine gael/fail and sinn fein, all open borders eu arse lickers.
They dont want any competition for their jobs and pensions, and have a great relationship with the eu/us and their globalist/corporate friends. The silent majority can mess that all up for them.


It is illegal to not vote in most of latin america
Brazil is a mulatto/mestizo mix of mostly poor trying to marry up the european blood line, with an elite pedigree class of people with purer european lineage on top of the pyramid.
If the people dont vote, it undermines the whole setup, and because the majority are all on the same page, there is a good chance a country wide/community led uprising could achieve that.
So instead you make it illegal to not vote and make sure those that are going for office are on the same page as you, if you only have to corrupt the officials its easy to manage.

However, if you dont have a 85/90 IQ mulato mix in terms of population that is looking up to the pure bred elites at the top, you would want to mix and match as much as possible along ethnic/class/generational divisions instead.

Ethnic, Race mixing is good for this, create children with fucked up identity problems and so do your best to undermine any cultural identity/unity. Flood your area with foreigners and wreck any unity and so community response to the state as you are more worried about getting robbed walking to the newsagents, and so look to the state for help or as savior. This will also allow for the militarisation of police and krackdown on personal freedoms to stem discent.

Class division is dependent on the social and economic policies pushed, like you can promote it so everyone rich and poor goes to lunch in the same public places or not, but the default enevitable divisons start through property brackets, suburbs vs inner city/ethnic enclaves. And jobs.
But just by working alongside the immigrants themselves, you may have more incommon with them on class lines then ethnic lines, and so will start thinking more on class lines as default, rather then we are all irish etc...

Generational/Family. Fuck the old. Rebel against your parents, your a person too, they cannot discipline you, dont do what your told, listen to that music that is conpletely different to theirs etc... This also plays into creating the individual consumer, always rebelling against family, defaulting into an atomised pleb looking for a path/reason/identity which the state will fill where necessary.
This is also done by default by birth rate if you import large amounts of people, little of the elderly population is non ethnic and the majority of the under 5's and so the future 16/18 year old voters are non ethnic.


Keep mixing it up, and the electorate will be voting against each other on multiple conflicting lines and not taking notice of what the elites are doing. This is Amerimutt.
Which is why Trump looked at the time to be something different, as in the silent majority looked up and tried to unite in a last attempt before demographics made it impossible.

People complain about church and state, but most of europe had a church/state eg orthodox/protestant countries or super church and state eg. catholic countries, setup.
This was the original globalism in europe, where we were all together as Christians, but under one ethnic identity/country, and it allowed for democracy to thrive which kept at least some of the ethnic/identity/unity under the nation.

The europeans didnt bring this with them when they set up America, and so you have to make up what unites under concepts like nfl/baseball/coca cola/military/mammon and as it has none of the moral unity that a common religion would promote you get the dog eat dog darwinism pushed between groups and within groups. And this is why social cohesive ingroups have excelled in America. This is why they pushed the american dream concept as a "hope and change" propaganda for the young/foolish to ligitimise the rat race.

We are turning into that.


As an aside, It is important to understand the role of things like Sports in this. The GAA was used to promote Irish identity in the face of the English, but sport can be used as a weapon against the people. The GAA is being destroyed by the plantation of Ireland, a 20 year old who spent his life playing for his parish leaves the country, and is replaced by someone who couldnt play if they even wanted and likely has zero interest from what i have found of these imports. So not only have you lost a generation from the sport, the following generation the replacement produces is far less likely to be involved as well.

This is why they push the Rugby like mad, a foreign international sport, with a mix of people playing that look as likely to draw their lineage from previous invasions or associate with an international Ireland, rather then the original ethnic Irish, singing a foreign anthem which is ment to be all inclusive of what the team represents, a multicult Ireland.
You want to promote social cohesion along lines that you control that are outside internal politics/voting, which also act as distractions and stop people from using what little free time they have to look up from the cage or ask their fellow man/family what the fuck is going on. And can then be used more as country against country propaganda. The winter olympics is a good example going on now. Either way, you can get all the plebs to look at a tv and think they are all in it together in the pub/bookies/stadium/couch, and everything is going great because someone who does not represent you beats who gives a fuck.

And so the media has less information to contend with being in conflict with what you have been told that day and they tell you as you were too busy cheering on abc, and so a much easier time to filling your head with their answers to why xyz is the way it is.
 
Last edited: